Abu Dhabi GP Friday Press Conference

QUESTIONS FROM THE FLOOR

Q: (Andrea Cremonesi – La Gazzetta Dello Sport): Toto, you know what Lewis said here in the press conference yesterday about the mechanics, the book and so on. I would like to have your comment and that you don't have any regret over that decision at the beginning of the season?

TW: You know it's always dangerous because there is one statement that is being picked out from a press conference between the two of them and as I said before I find it very remarkable how they've managed the relationship between the two of them for the benefit of the team, taking into consideration that it must be very intense and very high pressure for them. So that one comment was taken out and it is clear that if you change a crew that is directly involved with a drivers, such as mechanics or a number one that a driver constantly looks at when he's pulling out of the garage, it can have a psychological effect and we acknowledged that and it was part of our thinking when we shuffled it around. But as a matter of fact we are 1,500 people in Brixworth and Brackley and it's about developing personnel. Somebody who was working on one corner of the car today as a mechanic might be a number one next year, might be a chief mechanic afterwards and maybe has even more potential within the organisation. In a similar way we have done all through the organization we are not keeping it static. It's a dynamic structure and the same happens in the garage. This is a fact. I appreciate the effect on the singular driver and it was taken into consideration and maybe I'll write a book in 10 years and we'll put some things in there.

Q: (Ysef Harding – Xero Xone News) To follow up on that question Toto. Isn't it important to keep your number one satisfied and to give him the best of everything he needs to be successful – especially in the beginning of the season when he was aiming for a fourth world championship?

TW: It's very important. It is, in terms of keeping the performance up in the team, you need to consider what your high-performance need; what kind of environment they need, what kind of framework they need in order to perform best. And we've considered that. And there is not just one position like the chief mechanic that is important for the performance of the team and the drivers but we have to take decisions for many, many hundreds of people and develop them. It is our duty and obligation towards these 1500 people and the great brand to take the right decisions and not one single individual – although taking into mind what is important for the driver itself. What you are seeing here on the race track is the tip of the iceberg. And by the sheer nature there is a large block underneath that brings performance and has brought the team to where we are today. And part of that is to have the most effective organization. Not only today but also tomorrow – and that is just part of the normal procedure.

But if you knew that was going to psychologically affect your number one driver, why would you make that decision?

TW: I've explained it to you already once before that weekend. There's 1500 and we need to take care that these 1500 perform well. Not one. 1500.

Q: (Jerome Pugmire – AP) Question for Toto. You said that the pressure is coming up. Just speaking about Nico, do you think that this season he's been able to deal with pressure better and perhaps he's a bit more focused and blocking things out more than he was in the previous two campaigns?

TW: Yes, he deals with it very well and there is nothing that somehow affects him. This is at least my impression. Whether it's a difficult weekend, he has learned to assess it in the right way at the right time and move on – or whether it's a good weekend, to stay humble, both feet on the ground and try to understand why that was. Whether spirits are high or spirits are down it was all pretty stable with him – and certainly, as far as I can see, that is one of the keys why he's leading the championship today.

Q: (Dieter Rencken – Racing Lines) Stephen, the Brazilian Grand Prix was obviously from a personal perspective, your own perspective, rather disappointing. Can you try and tell us exactly how you felt when you realized that the cost of this could possibly run to $13 or $15million and potentially even more in the longer term?

SF: Yeah, I think the first reaction wasn't really a financial one. It would have been a very exciting race and coming to the end of what was an exhilarating season, lots of ups and downs. We had held tenth place for, I think, ten races, Brazil was number ten and at many points during the race there were lots of different scenarios and there was a lot of furious calculations about finishing the race at different points throughout. The first reaction I had was one of real disappointment for the team. I think they've worked incredibly hard for the last, let's say, 18 months since the start of last season without much reward and it looked like we were heading for a tenth-place finish which was a big step forward for us. So one of immediate disappointment for the team who worked so hard all year back at the factory and here on the circuit. But my next reaction was actually one of… I thought of the opposite feeling that must be going on in the Sauber garage and I thought that the guys in the Sauber team had been fantastic competitors for us all year, we'd enjoyed a great battle with them and I knew how much those points meant to the Sauber team and I was trying to imagine the joy they would be having and they worked so hard all season to bring it back in the end. So in the end I think the season doesn't come down to one race. Obviously the way the points are structured that was a critical race for us. Very unexpected. But that's racing. On that day it didn't go our way but I think we all want to see more of that unpredictability, that excitement. So, in the end, it was a difficult night, let's say, and then back to business.

Q: (Graham Harris – Motorsport Monday) Question for Stephen again, and Monisha. Monisha, potentially for you, you could have tenth place locked in at the end of the season. Both teams, Monisha, you've got a new investor on-board already, Stephen you potential have a new investor on-board. Does the swapping of positions have any influence on the business decisions made. Obviously it's more attractive for you Monisha but Stephen, does that put your deal in any particular jeopardy or is it going to hurt you financially? Things planned that you can't do?

SF: It doesn't help financially but the terms of our agreement have been… refinalized, let's say. It was clear that in tenth place with one point on the board, two races left, that there are lots of scenarios and you plan for those in advance, so, from my point of view it's disappointing but it's not unexpected – or at least not a surprise.

Not a deal-breaker?

SF: Not a deal-breaker. And, most importantly, we're not finished yet. We're looking good today, at least, on Friday, so we've still got one race left.

MK: Well, in our case, the investors came in at a time when we were on P11, so the risks were very well known. So the risks were very well known. And of course we said we are going to do all we can to actually still get to P10. So, it looks better if you end the season, of course, on P10, that's clear – but there's not any other impact.

[off-mic follow-up] adding more staff?

MK: Well no. As I said, with the investors we have, our future is secured. There's nothing out there that would cause us any dramas like in the past – but you simply look better if you have our business case and if you have that additional funding it's just easier to achieve what you want in your business case.

Q: (René Hofmann– Suddeutsche Zeitung) I wanted to ask all five of you, concerning the upcoming season: what the rule changes mean for your particular team, what are your hopes, what the challenges you're facing?

OS: Well, for a team like ours it's a big challenge, starting over without any carryover parts whatsoever has a massive impact on us – so it's a big challenge. We also don't have some of the infrastructure in place of the bigger teams. We source a lot of our parts to suppliers; we don't make them ourselves – so that adds extra time. So yeah, it's a big challenge. Our hopes are we've done a good job and others have screwed-up!

Claire?

CW: We hope the same! That everyone else has screwed-up as well. No, y'know, for us, fortunately we're in quite a comfortable financial position at the moment and with the regulations coming out when they did, we were able to start development work on next year's car pretty early but that's not to say we know where our performance is. Nobody does until we get to the first test and probably not until we get to the first few races where we know where everybody shakes out. But I think it presents a great opportunity for Formula One to potentially shake up the order. I hope that we've found something spectacular over the winter. I know that the guys back at the factory have worked really hard on next year's car to try and find that performance and improve upon where we finish this year's championship next year. But I think we just have to wait and see. For the sport, I think it's pretty exciting.

Monisha?

MK: Well, we share that hope as well. We know that we have to take a very big step ahead so we see these rule changes as an opportunity because we want to be back next year in the midfield and we now also have the means to do that. Overall, we do hope that it's going to make the sport exciting. I think everyone's been quite critical about certain things which have been introduced so let's just hope and see if it really mixes up the grid and we have something different next year.

Stephen?

SF: Well, interestingly in 2016 we had to build a completely new car: Manor didn't build a 2015 car because of the administration, so we feel that we've been through this already. There was such a big gap between where we were in 2014 and the other teams this year, so we've had to make that big step already. I gave the team quite clear instructions this year they were to focus as much of their efforts as possibly on the 2016 program until we were able to put some points on the board and try to secure tenth place. From Austria onwards the team have been working exclusively on the 2017 program, so there's been a lot of work gone in. We've really built up the resources of the team this year, we've moved to a great new facility; the wind tunnel facility at Mercedes and that's led to a big step forwards in our aerodynamic development. So the team are hopeful. The thing I guess I'm not really hoping for is that everyone else has screwed-up, because like I said, I've developed a lot of respect for all the other teams and I think that might be too much to hope for. It's certainly going to be a very interesting 2017 season.

Toto, you pick up where you left off do you, next year?

TW: Yeah, I tend to go with Otmar! Honestly, we weren't big supporters of a regulation change. Not because we wanted to freeze the current situation. It's clear that when regulations stay stable that eventually performance is going to converge. But because we weren't sure that it is the right way for Formula One. But as it is, we are where we are and the cars, certainly in the wind tunnel, look very spectacular, very wide with the big tires and I am personally very excited to see them on track for the first time. For the drivers it will be much harder; the cars will be pulling more g through the corners. The simulations that we have seen are very exciting. The corners will be flat that are far from flat today – and we will be breaking records in terms of lap time. So, I guess, an exciting season that will be ahead of us. I hope that overtaking is not going to be too difficult because of the width of the car and the dirty air behind it – but let's see. In hindsight, now that we are where we are, we have to do the best out of it.

Q: (Andrew Benson – BBC Sport) Stephen, when this investment deal happens, will you still be involved and/or in charge? Is it a buy-in or a buy-out?

SF: I'm not going to talk anything about the specifics.

Q: (Dieter Rencken – Racing Lines) To Toto specifically but if the others would like to join in please feel free. Toto, you've been on the strategy group since its inception basically. Do you honestly believe that it best serves Formula One's interests? At the latest one, for example, I believe the teams on either side of you put in certain proposals. These were blocked before they could even reach the Formula One commission so therefore they can't be voted on properly. Does this really work and is there an alternative to this because there's been an awful lot of criticism about the group?

TW: You are a number one fan of the strategy group, we've found out. It is what it is. In Formula One, the difficulty is that every team has got to have an opinion and it is very much focused of course on your own performance but then we are responsible enough, within the group, to take into consideration what's good for Formula One and most recently I've seen a development that even within the very big rivals on the strategy group and in the F1 commission there is consensus and we're trying to seek consensus. Some of the things are not being accepted or not voted on. You refer to two specific proposals which, with all due respect to my friend Otmar, were on the agenda half a year ago. They were referred to the technical regulations meeting, so the competent group, not the dangerous group! The competent group decided that it was not the right way forward and for whatever reason these regulations appeared back on the agenda on the strategy group and this is why it was voted against, that is the fact. But that governance is in place until 2020 and if there is a possibility that we can improve it next time around in order to better the approval process, I'm the first one to vote in favor.

SF: I never attended this strategy group. I have no idea what happens in the strategy group but I joked earlier on that Toto and Mercedes were winning too many races and maybe it's been a problem for him but really I know that the Mercedes team is a fantastic organization and has earned these victories but the sport is not a level playing field, that's pretty obvious and the structure of the F1 commission and the F1 strategy group is part of that bigger picture. And I think the sport will be much improved and speaking now, as the eleventh placed team this weekend, I know that it's obviously what I will be saying but the sport will be much improved with a leveler playing field and how that comes about and all of the necessary components – whether financial, organizational, structurally – I think it's something that should be looked at for the benefit of everybody on the grid but it's a very complex picture.

Q: (Jerome Pugmire – AP) Toto, there have been some stressful moments this season. If you were to give your podium of the top three between the first lap incident in Spain, the last lap in Austria and the engine failure for Lewis when he was about to win, which is the one-two-three for you?

TW: You mean number one is the worst one? Shall we start from the back? Third place, for me, of the worst races is certainly Lewis's engine failure in Malaysia because it heavily influenced his championship. He was in the lead, solid in the lead in a race – in races – where it was going back and forth with Nico. Nico had a great race in Singapore which he dominated. Then Malaysia was very much Lewis's weekend and it continued that way in – what was the next one? – Suzuka, Mexico. So that's third place – and it came out of nowhere, really, so still a bit of a traumatic race. Number two? Barcelona. It's rare that you have a complete wipe-out, one and two in the front and you end up with zero points and for the team, obviously not a nice situation. We stood in front of the screens… I remember, I had the CEO of Daimler, Dieter Zetsche, next to me and he says ‘what are we doing now?' which was a new experience. But it was OK because it didn't happen for a long time, since Spa 2014. So number one, for me, the worst, was Austria because it came a couple of races after Barcelona. We made it very clear that we saw Barcelona as a one-off and wasn't acceptable going forward and here we go, we're on the last lap of that particular race at the Red Bull-ring, home turf for our great rivals and we nearly lose both cars on the last lap, being in one and two. This is where, for me, the mark was over-stepped and we made that clear, but that was my winner. Not.

Q: (Dan Knutson – Auto Action and Speed Sport) Monisha, Banco do Brasil announced today they will not sponsor Felipe next year. How much of an impact does that have on you deciding if he remains with the team?

MK: Well that's correct that the bank informed us as well that they've interrupted their 2017 sponsorship program. Our seat is still open. We aren't choosing that in our assessments we're making and that's all there is to say of it.

Q: (Dieter Rencken – Racing Lines) On that vein, Toto, your driver Pascal Wehrlein, Mercedes driver, has basically only got one chance left for a seat next year. Could you see him actually racing in a car with a Ferrari engine?

TW: It's two, two chances.

Q: (Dieter Rencken – Racing Lines) Yes, but then you'd have to provide a budget, wouldn't you?

TW: First of all, I must say, really, having had the opportunity with Esteban and Pascal in Manor was great and the development slope of that team is impressive and it's a great place for both of them and Manor is still very much an opportunity for next year. Well obviously Esteban is going to Force India and we are in discussion with Monisha and in discussion with Stephen and his management group and nothing is decided yet. That's where we are.

Q: (Andrea Cremonesi – La Gazzetta dello Sport) Toto, do you think that at this moment Lewis Hamilton fully trusts your team or if not are you doing something to rebuild the relationship?

TW: Absolutely trusts. We under-estimate the pressure under which these guys are, not only in the spotlight of a global audience. You have to deliver every single weekend, you have to race your teammate, it's down to the last race to win the championship and it's all coming up, all the frustrations and all the happy moments. If a microphone is being put under the nose and you're being asked the right question, sometimes it produces a good headline like it did yesterday. For me, it's a bit of a boomerang which keeps coming back, this odd story which internally in the team is a closed chapter and we will not come back to this so it doesn't change anything in my approach to Lewis or an approach towards Lewis because I think it's well understood that things are sometimes taken out of context, sometimes over-exaggerated and as I said before, sometimes you just need to allow that the drivers can express their feelings and their emotions. We don't want to streamline them too much.

Q: (Ysef Harding – Xiro Xone News) Claire and Monisha, we've seen a lot of history for women this year. We saw the second female prime minister elected and we also saw the first female elected for president of the United States. As two pioneers in this sport, what are your hopes for the future for women on the business side and on the track in F1?

CW: That's a nice question! I think what you see across probably a wide variety of industries in recent years and particularly what you see in the UK with Theresa May coming in as our first female prime minister for – what is it? – three decades I think, that the landscape is shifting slowly but surely. I think there is a lot of work to do but personally – I don't know what Monisha does – but I go out and do a lot of talks about women in industry and promoting females in not just leadership roles but throughout different sorts of organizations and I think that's really important and I think one of the things about Formula One that you don't necessarily… yes, you see Monisha and I in the roles that we're in but there are so many women now who are working across different areas within Formula One, across different disciplines within teams, whether that be in aerodynamics, within engineering, not just the traditional marketing roles and I think that's a really important shift that we're seeing in our sport and I think that that can be used as case studies and great story telling, to go out into different businesses because I think if you can be a woman and do well in Formula One. I think that's a very powerful message but personally for me, it's not necessarily about gender and it shouldn't be about gender I think. But every individual brings different personalities to the roles that they do and particularly in a sport like this, where you have to operate at your peak performance if you're going to be successful and achieve and that's what every team is going after, it's the people who are at the best at their jobs. If they're going to win in this sport then it shouldn't necessarily be about gender, it should be about how good you are at your job and how committed and dedicated and what you can do, the team around you. But I would like to see more women come in to Formula One and I would like to see more women come into industry as a whole. I think it's a really important conversation that we're having in society as a whole at the moment.

MK: Yeah, like Claire said, you see that there are far more women in Formula One. It's been happening over the last few years, actually, where you simply see more on the track. I think the most important responsibility we have here is to actually encourage people to give women the opportunity, because that's what it's about. You have enough women out there who have the education, who have the competence and the confidence to actually get the job done at least equally as good and usually they have to be a little bit better to maybe get the same kind of recognition, so what you really need is to give women a fair chance and opportunity.

Q: And it was a woman in charge of strategy in your team who played a part in bringing you the points in Brazil, right?

MK: Absolutely. We gave one a chance.