for your iPhone
for your iPad
IndyCar

IndyCar Links

2017 Teams

2017 Schedule

2016 IC Rule Book

2015 IC Engine Rules

2015 IC Aero Rules

2014 Indy Lights Rules

2014 Pro Mazda Rules

2014 USF2000 Rules

2014 Drug Policy

2014 Scanner Freq

Race Car Comparison

Lap Time Comparison

History CART/IRL Split


2017 Point Standings
After Pocono
Rank Driver Points

1 Josef Newgarden 494
2 Scott Dixon 476
3 Helio Castroneves 472
4 Simon Pagenaud 468
5 Will Power 452
6 Graham Rahal 418
7 Takuma Sato 399
8 Alexander Rossi 394
9 Tony Kanaan 351
10 James Hinchcliffe 327
11 Max Chilton 322
12 Ryan Hunter-Reay 322
13 Marco Andretti 306
14 Ed Jones 298
15 JR Hildebrand 288
16 Carlos Munoz 256
17 Mikhail Aleshin 237
18 Charlie Kimball 237
19 Conor Daly 215
20 Spencer Pigot 165
21 Ed Carpenter 160
22 Sebastien Bourdais 136
23 Gabby Chaves 98
24 Juan Pablo Montoya 93
25 Esteban Gutierrez 91
26 Sebastian Saavedra 61
27 Oriol Servia 61
28 Fernando Alonso 47
29 Pippa Mann 32
30 Jay Howard 24
31 Sage Karam 23
32 Zach Veach 23
33 James Davison 21
34 Jack Harvey 17
35 Tristan Vautier 15
36 Buddy Lazier 14

Rookie of Year Standings
1. Ed Jones 298
2. Esteban Gutierrez 91
3. Fernando Alonso 47
4. Zach Veach 23
5. Jack Harvey 17

Manufacturer Standings
1. Chevy 1118
2. Honda 1110

Is it ultimately better for IndyCar to wean off OEMs?

IndyCar, like F1, has some hard decisions to make
Thursday, August 10, 2017

Advertisement

2.2-liter dual-turbo Honda V6 engine
2.2-liter dual-turbo Honda V6 engine

It is becoming increasingly evident that IndyCar has some very hard decisions to make with regard to its future engine formula.

In the early days of the sport the engines had little relevance to passenger car engines, but the Offenhauser and Cosworth engines were the last of a dying breed.

For the past 20 to 30 years car manufacturers (OEMs) have become involved with the sport in a big way.

When companies like Toyota, Honda, Ford, and even Mercedes entered the sport, things changed, and not always for the better. They built better engines, which was good, and they also injected much needed money into the paddock in the way of team incentives, TV ad buys, track signage, race title sponsor – the list goes on.

Everything seemed right with the world.....except the cost to go racing skyrocketed to unprecedented levels.

And a lot of the money came from the R&D side of the house which justified them spending huge sums of money in the sport. Not only was their participation used to train engineers, but also to develop better engine technology that could be moved over to the passenger side of their business – their bread and butter. And win on Sunday, sell on Monday still does have some relevance from a marketing standpoint.

A consequence of manufacturers spending all that money in the series is their ability to dictate what the engine formulas would be so the engines they race have some relevance to their passenger car engines.

I doubt there really is that much relevance but at least it’s a way to sell the proposal to go racing to the company board so they would fund the program.

Over the years some really fantastic race engines have been produced by the manufacturers – internal combustion race engines that sounded really fantastic. Who can forget the screaming F1 engine days, or the days when Ford, Mercedes, Toyota, Honda and even Porsche were fighting it out in CART with turbo engines turning in the neighborhood of 16,000 screaming RPM.

It was magical.

But all that is about to change.

Passenger cars are going electric. The magical days of the internal combustion engine will soon be over.

Manufacturers are all heading over to Formula E with their big R&D budgets because that is where the future of the passenger car is headed and Formula E has some real relevance to electric passenger cars – how to get max power and max battery longevity - It is a real engineering challenge.

And it's two areas that are attracting huge R&D money today.

But where does that leave series like IndyCar, F1, NASCAR and WEC?

Do they too go all-electric to ensure relevance to passenger cars with the hope that some of the manufacturers R&D money will flow their way? Certainly having a great sounding internal combustion race engine will have zero relevance to the passenger car business.

And hence the dilemma

No one can argue that watching electric cars race is exciting. They are not.

While we here at AR1.com are huge proponents of electric passenger cars, we are not in favor of them for the race track.

Without the sound to excite your senses, Formula E is very boring and fans will not attend races on a regular basis to watch quiet race cars. They might show up once for the novelty.

Nothing lights up the hair on the back of your neck like a screaming internal combustion race engine

So......Should IndyCar ween off the OEM R&D money trough?

For over 20 years IndyCar, NASCAR, F1 and the WEC have been feeding from the OEM trough
For some 30 years IndyCar, NASCAR, F1 and the WEC have been feeding from the OEM trough

So that leads us to ask the question – is there a workable financial model by which a top-level racing series can be profitable without huge money from the auto manufacturers?

If there is, then a race series like IndyCar can build and race super exciting race cars that have almost zero relevance to a passenger car.

If there isn't, the mandate will continue to be “if you want our money than your engine and battery technology must be relevant to our R&D.”

Then it’s likely all future race cars will be electric (since all passenger cars will be electric), fans will stop being interested, and the sport will cease to exist.

There is not a single person I know in motorsports, and I know thousands, and not a single fan in the world, who did not love the screaming F1 engines of the 90s and early 2000s.

They took your breath away.

They made the hair stand up on the back of your neck.

They made fans beg for more.

Now they are gone and F1 has switched to boring hybrid engines that fans hate.

So here is IndyCar’s chance to win over new fans.

Forget going electric. IndyCar should be the counterpoint -- pure racing, man and machine, a competition of the best drivers in the world with screaming internal combustion engines. 

It's time for IndyCar to ween off the milk
It's time for IndyCar to ween off the milk

Forget feeding at the OEM R&D money trough.

Switch to standard screaming normally aspirated V8 engines produced by a Cosworth or Ilmor, turning at least 16,000 RPM and I guarantee you IndyCar’s fan base will double in one year.

I guarantee you IndyCar’s TV ratings will double in one year.

And in year 2 both will double again.

IndyCar will become the new F1 and many F1 fans will become IndyCar fans.

It would be a real Coup de Grace for IndyCar.

And at that point sponsors will be flooding back into the paddock in a big way and IndyCar and its teams won’t miss that OEM R&D money one bit.

In fact I will go out on a limb and predict that when the grandstands are full, TV ratings skyrocketing, and fan interest through the roof, OEMs will come to IndyCar begging to badge that screaming engine.

The question is whether IndyCar has the foresight to understand that feeding from the OEM trough is not the future.

Watch the video below. I dare anyone to tell me I'm wrong!

Mark C. reporting for AutoRacing1.com

Feedback can be sent to feedback@autoracing1.com

Go to our forums to discuss this article