for your iPhone
for your iPad
IndyCar

IndyCar Links

2016 Teams

2016 Schedule

2016 IC Rule Book

2015 IC Engine Rules

2015 IC Aero Rules

2014 Indy Lights Rules

2014 Pro Mazda Rules

2014 USF2000 Rules

2014 Drug Policy

2014 Scanner Freq

Race Car Comparison

Lap Time Comparison

History CART/IRL Split


2016 Standings
After Road America
Rank Driver Points

1 Simon Pagenaud 375
2 Helio Castroneves 301
3 Will Power 294
4 Scott Dixon 285
5 Josef Newgarden 283
6 Tony Kanaan 280
7 Carlos Munoz 262
8 Graham Rahal 261
9 Juan Pablo Montoya 259
10 Alexander Rossi 257
11 Ryan Hunter-Reay 256
12 Charlie Kimball 255
13 James Hinchcliffe 242
14 Sebastien Bourdais 222
15 Takuma Sato 186
Conor Daly 186
17 Marco Andretti 184
18 Mikhail Aleshin 169
19 Max Chilton 149
20 Jack Hawksworth 129
21 Spencer Pigot 97
22 Gabby Chaves 92
23 JR Hildebrand 84
24 Oriol Servia 72
25 Townsend Bell 55
26 Luca Filippi 45
27 Matt Brabham 37
28 Alex Tagliani 35
29 Ed Carpenter 33
Pippa Mann 33
31 Sage Karam 22
32 Bryan Clauson 21
33 Stefan Wilson 14
34 Buddy Lazier 12


Manufacturers
Chevy 461
Honda 319
Texas underscores what is right with IndyCar

by Tim Wohlford
Friday, June 7, 2013

Advertisement

Justin Wilson won last year for Dale Coyne
Ah yes, it’s time for Texas again.  And once again, Texas is a case study in all that is good in IndyCar – and all that can go wrong.

Bluntly stated, I came to Texas last year fully prepared to write about bad news.  After all, it was the first high-banked super speedway race with the new Dallara chassis, and the first high-banked track race after the Vegas event the previous fall had taken the life of Dan Wheldon. 

And as CART fans remember, in 2001 drivers suffered vertigo due to the speed of the cars – which was, arguably, the beginning of the end for that series.

However, a strange thing happened – it was one of the best IndyCar races ever.  The cars were competitive without racing in the dreaded pack.  The better drivers went to the lead, although a few bemoaned having to race there at all. 

First Scott Dixon, then Graham Rahal, dominated before hitting the wall, handing the victory to a surprised Justin Wilson in front of a stunned crowd.

So what happened?  In a word, IndyCar changed the aero formula, and got it right.  Working with Firestone and the engine manufacturers, IndyCar tries to provide a safe, entertaining and cost-effective race.  (And yes, this means that I believe that IndyCar blew it for the 2011 Vegas race.) 

Some Indy drivers, as well as some AutoRacing1 editors, lobbied for lower down force on the big ovals for years.  This effectively turns them into mechanical grip cars instead of down force grip cars, and at the Texas race last year, they gave it a try.  And, it worked, as it did for California later in the season. 

“The cars are safer than they used to be” due to a lack of pack racing comment Helio Castroneves this morning.

So, fast forward to this year.  Although IndyCar is keeping last year’s spec for the high-banked races, IndyCar is nothing if it isn’t a place where all old ideas seem to be dragged out of storage once in a while.  Now we’re hearing new IndyCar management talking once again about “aero kits” for, well, sometime in the future. 

And even worse yet, talk of “new track records.”  The concerns are obvious – will IndyCar be able to strike a balance between safety, cost and “the good show” if it has multiple aero configurations?

And if IndyCar tries for a “new track record” at Texas... well, it’s just not possible.

Feedback can be sent to feedback@autoracing1.com

Go to our forums to discuss this article