for your iPhone
for your iPad
IndyCar

IndyCar Links

2017 Teams

2017 Schedule

2016 IC Rule Book

2015 IC Engine Rules

2015 IC Aero Rules

2014 Indy Lights Rules

2014 Pro Mazda Rules

2014 USF2000 Rules

2014 Drug Policy

2014 Scanner Freq

Race Car Comparison

Lap Time Comparison

History CART/IRL Split


2017 Point Standings
After Sonoma
Rank Driver Points

1 Josef Newgarden 642
2 Simon Pagenaud 629
3 Scott Dixon 621
4 Helio Castroneves 598
5 Will Power 562
6 Graham Rahal 522
7 Alexander Rossi 494
8 Takuma Sato 441
9 Ryan Hunter-Reay 421
10 Tony Kanaan 403
11 Max Chilton 396
12 Marco Andretti 388
13 James Hinchcliffe 376
14 Ed Jones 354
15 JR Hildebrand 347
16 Carlos Munoz 328
17 Charlie Kimball 327
18 Conor Daly 305
19 Mikhail Aleshin 237
20 Spencer Pigot 218
21 Sebastien Bourdais 214
22 Ed Carpenter 169
23 Gabby Chaves 98
24 Juan Pablo Montoya 93
25 Esteban Gutierrez 91
26 Sebastian Saavedra 80
27 Oriol Servia 61
28 Jack Harvey 57
29 Fernando Alonso 47
30 Pippa Mann 32
31 Zachary Claman DeMelo 26
32 Jay Howard 24
33 Zach Veach 23
34 Sage Karam 23
35 James Davison 21
36 Tristan Vautier 15
37 Buddy Lazier 14

Rookie of Year Standings
1. Ed Jones 354
2. Esteban Gutierrez 91
3. Jack Harvey 57
4. Fernando Alonso 47
5. Zach Veach 23

Manufacturer Standings
1. Chevy 1489
2. Honda 1326

INDYCAR: Who Cares Who Was the Worst?

by Stephen Cox
Monday, March 25, 2013

Advertisement

What a great way to kick off the IndyCar season.

So I’m sitting here browsing articles and I run across a piece that attempts to name the “worst drivers in IndyCar history,” as if such a determination was possible. It figured it was a waste of time, so I passed.

I continue browsing. Surely, I thought, there is no cosmic miracle sufficient to cause two or more equally disturbed authors to write on such a topic.

I was wrong.

A search for “worst IndyCar driver” turned up pieces including “Worst Drivers Hall of Fame,” “Worst IndyCar Driver of All Time,” “Worst Drivers of the Past 20 Years,” and scores more.

Consumed by the same demented curiosity that drives people to watch reality television, I eventually broke down and read one. Big mistake. There is apparently a shocking number of racing journalists ready to anoint themselves judge and jury over the careers of their betters who accomplished vastly more in the sport than did they.

Now don’t get me wrong. We do not live in a fluffy unicorn rainbow world where everyone speaks nicely about everyone else all the time. What fun would that be? Sometimes drivers just drive badly. Sometimes they goof up. Nothing wrong with observing that.

And it’s utterly impossible for a journalist – even a well-intentioned one – to write much of anything without offending someone somewhere. I know that from experience. 

But the first article I read qualified as none of the above. It was simply a bad collection of second-rate cheap shots at decent people who tried hard. I would compare it to the National Enquirer but that would give tabloids a bad name.

The second article apparently held a contest in which sufficiently unbalanced “fans” could vote for the worst IndyCar driver in history, as if any genuine fan would consider such a thing. This piece had all the intelligence of an episode of Here Comes Honey Boo-Boo but none of the suspense.

For crying out loud. No matter how these drivers may have performed on the track, what did any of them (or us) do to deserve this level of toilet-bowl journalism?

Journalists frequently hide behind the excuse that drivers are “public figures.” Well, by my reckoning, journalists are public figures, too. So why doesn’t this work both ways?

I’m going to do a search in the hopes of finding an article titled, “The 20 Most Pathetic IndyCar Journalists in History” by Hiro Matsushita. Now that would be an article worth reading. I bet Hiro has stories that would melt concrete… stories we would already know if any of these journalists had ever bothered to actually do their jobs.

So perhaps this is not a “public figure” issue. Perhaps it’s a character issue. Seriously, what kind of a person even writes this stuff? 

An even dumber defense is the claim that these articles are “just for fun.” Really? For whom? I wonder how much fun the people on the receiving end of this nonsense are having.

But I can roll with that. This article is just for fun, too. Fair enough? 

I have long held a particular distaste for those who are outside the game yet somehow feel qualified to perpetually criticize those in it, all while cowering behind the safety of a keyboard where their real talents can never be tested.

Nevertheless, in the spirit of good fun, I say we give them the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps they simply lack sufficient knowledge of the sport to write anything else. Or perhaps their skill set only allows them to advance by stepping on others.

Either way, the only thing these “Worst Driver” articles really proves is the one thing we knew all along…

You can still make a nice living in journalism by hacking up other people.

Stephen Cox

Feedback can be sent to feedback@autoracing1.com

Go to our forums to discuss this article