for your iPhone
for your iPad
IndyCar

IndyCar Links

2014 Schedule

2014 IndyCar Rules

2014 Indy Lights Rules

2014 Pro Mazda Rules

2014 USF2000 Rules

2014 Drug Policy

2014 Teams

2014 Scanner Freq

Race Car Comparison

Lap Time Comparison

History CART/IRL Split


2014 Standings
After Toronto
Driver Standings

Driver Standings
1 Helio Castroneves 533
2 Will Power 520
3 Ryan Hunter-Reay 464
4 Simon Pagenaud 462
5 Juan Pablo Montoya 428
6 Scott Dixon 387
7 Carlos Munoz (R) 384
8 Tony Kanaan 380
9 Marco Andretti 375
10 Sebastien Bourdais 358
11 Ryan Briscoe 344
12 James Hinchcliffe 330
13 Charlie Kimball 317
14 Justin Wilson 311
15 Mikhail Aleshin 298
16 Josef Newgarden 288
17 Jack Hawksworth (R) 287
18 Graham Rahal 266
19 Carlos Huertas (R) 265
20 Takuma Sato 234
21 Sebastian Saavedra 229
22 Mike Conway 218
23 Ed Carpenter 168
24 Oriol Servia 88
25 Kurt Busch (R) 80
26 JR Hildebrand 66
27 Sage Karam (R) 57
28 Luca Filippi 46
29 James Davison (R) 34
30 Jacques Villeneuve 29
31 Alex Tagliani 28
32 Townsend Bell 22
33 Pippa Mann 21
34 Martin Plowman (R) 18
35 Buddy Lazier 11
36 Franck Montagny 8

Rookie of the Year
1 Carlos Munoz 384
2 Mikhail Aleshin 298
3 Jack Hawksworth 287
4 Carlos Huertas 265
5 Kurt Busch 80
6 Sage Karam 57
7 James Davison 34
8 Martin Plowman 18

Wins
T1 Ryan Hunter-Reay 3
T2 Will Power 2
T2 Simon Pagenaud 2
T2 Mike Conway 2
T5 Helio Castroneves 1
T5 Carlos Huertas 1
T5 Ed Carpenter 1
T5 Juan Pablo Montoya 1
T5 Sebastien Bourdais 1

Podium Finishes
T1 Will Power 6
T1 Helio Castroneves 6
3 Ryan Hunter-Reay 5
4 Tony Kanaan 4
T5 Carlos Munoz 3
T5 Juan Pablo Montoya 3
T7 Marco Andretti 2
T7 Simon Pagenaud 2
T7 Mike Conway 2
T10 Carlos Huertas 1
T10 Scott Dixon 1
T10 Josef Newgarden 1
T10 Graham Rahal 1
T10 Charlie Kimball 1
T10 Ed Carpenter 1
T10 Jack Hawksworth 1
T10 Mikhail Aleshin 1
T10 Sebastien Bourdais 1
Manufacturer Standings:
1 Chevrolet 2056
2 Honda 1042

Lap Leaders:
1 Will Power 353
2 Tony Kanaan 326
3 Helio Castroneves 241
4 Ryan Hunter-Reay 167
5 Ed Carpenter 116
6 Juan Pablo Montoya 74
7 Takuma Sato 67
8 Sebastien Bourdais 60
9 Simon Pagenaud 59
10 James Hinchcliffe 56
11 Scott Dixon 44
12 Jack Hawksworth 32
13 Justin Wilson 25
14 Marco Andretti 22
T15 Mike Conway 15
T15 Josef Newgarden 15
17 Sebastian Saavedra 14
18 Graham Rahal 10
T19 Oriol Servia 7
T19 Carlos Huertas 7
21 Ryan Briscoe 5
22 Mikhail Aleshin 4
23 Alex Tagliani 3

Entrant Points
Pos. # Entrant Points
1 3 Team Penske 533
2 12 Team Penske 520
3 28 Andretti Autosport 464
4 77 Schmidt Peterson Hamilton Motorsports 462
5 2 Penske Motorsports 428
6 9 Target Chip Ganassi Racing 387
7 20 Ed Carpenter Racing 386
8 34 Andretti Autosport/HVM 384
9 10 Target Chip Ganassi Racing 380
10 25 Andretti Autosport 375
11 11 KVSH Racing 358
12 8 NTT Data Chip Ganassi Racing 344
13 27 Andretti Autosport 330
14 83 Novo Nordisk Chip Ganassi Racing 317
15 19 Dale Coyne Racing 311
16 7 Schmidt PetersonMotorsports 298
17 67 Sarah Fisher Hartman Racing 288
18 98 BHA/BBM with Curb-Agajanian 287
19 15 Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing 266
20 18 Dale Coyne Racing 265
21 14 A.J. Foyt Racing 234
22 17 KV/AFS Racing 229
23 16 Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing 134
24 26 Andretti Autosport 88
25 21 Ed Carpenter Racing 66
26 22 Dreyer and Reinbold 57
27 33 KV Racing Technology 34
28 5 Schmidt Peterson Motorsports 29
29 68 Sarah Fisher Hartman Racing 28
30 6 KV Racing Technology 22
31 63 Dale Coyne Racing 21
32 41 A.J. Foyt Racing 18
33 91 Lazier Partners Racing 11

Finishing Average
1 Helio Castroneves 5.38
T2 Kurt Busch 6.00
T2 Will Power 6.00
4 Simon Pagenaud 6.92
5 Sage Karam 9.00
6 Scott Dixon 9.61
7 J.R. Hildebrand 10.00
8 Tony Kanaan 10.23
9 Ryan Hunter-Reay 10.38
T10 Juan Pablo Montoya 11.15
T10 Sebastien Bourdais 11.15
12 Ryan Briscoe 11.38
13 Justin Wilson 11.92
14 Carlos Munoz 12.00
15 James Hinchcliffe 12.46
16 Oriol Servia 12.5
17 Marco Andretti 12.69
18 Ed Carpenter 12.75
19 Alex Tagliani 13.0
20 Charlie Kimball 13.23
21 Takuma Sato 13.46
22 Mikhail Aleshin 13.61
23 Jacques Villeneuve 14.0
24 Mike Conway 14.66
25 Graham Rahal 15.0
26 James Davison 16.0
27 Carlos Huertas 16.07
28 Josef Newgarden 16.92
29 Sebastian Saavedra 17.0
30 Jack Hawksworth 17.16
31 Luca Filippi 18.50
32 Martin Plowman 20.5
33 Franck Montagny 22.0
34 Pippa Mann 24.0
35 Townsend Bell 25.0
36 Buddy Lazier 32.0


Pole Positions
T1 Takuma Sato 2
T1 Will Power 2
T1 Helio Castroneves 2
T4 Ryan Hunter-Reay 1
T4 Sebastian Saavedra 1
T4 Ed Carpenter 1
T4 Simon Pagenaud 1
T4 Juan Pablo Montoya 1
T4 Scott Dixon 1
T4 Sebastien Bourdais 1

Appearances in the Firestone Fast Six
1 Ryan Hunter-Reay 5
T2 Helio Castroneves 4
T2 Will Power 4
T3 James Hinchcliffe 3
T3 Scott Dixon 3
T3 Jack Hawksworth 3
T7 Simon Pagenaud 2
T7 Josef Newgarden 2
T7 Tony Kanaan 2
T7 Sebastien Bourdais 2
T11 Takuma Sato 1
T11 Marco Andretti 1
T11 Sebastian Saavedra 1
T11 Mike Conway 1
T11 Juan Pablo Montoya 1
T11 Ryan Briscoe 1
T11 Luca Filippi 1

Qualifying Average
1 Helio Castroneves 5.53
2 James Hinchcliffe 6.90
3 Ed Carpenter 7.00
4 Luca Filippi 7.66
5 Simon Pagenaud 7.69
6 Will Power 7.76
7 Scott Dixon 8.84
8 J.R. Hildebrand 9.00
9 Sebastien Bourdais 9.76
10 Carlos Munoz 10.3
11 Tony Kanaan 10.53
12 Ryan Hunter-Reay 10.61
13 Juan Pablo Montoya 10.84
14 Takuma Sato 11.69
15 Kurt Busch 12.0
16 Marco Andretti 12.61
T17 Josef Newgarden 12.92
T17 Ryan Briscoe 12.92
19 Justin Wilson 13.0
20 Jack Hawksworth 14.5
21 Mike Conway 14.66
22 Mikhail Aleshin 14.84
23 Graham Rahal 15.38
24 Sebastian Saavedra 16.53
25 Charlie Kimball 17.15
26 Carlos Huertas 17.84
27 Franck Montagny 21.0
28 Pippa Mann 22.0
29 Alex Tagliani 24.0
30 Martin Plowman 24.5
31 Townsend Bell 25.0
32 Jacques Villeneuve 27.0
33 James Davison 28.0
34 Sage Karam 31.0
35 Buddy Lazier 33.0
Part 1: A look at IndyCar's horrid TV deal

by Brian Carroccio
Wednesday, January 09, 2013

Advertisement

Brian Carroccio
With apologies to Mark Miles, I'm going to talk about the past.

In the summer of 2008, on the heels of helping to unify the sport of Indy car racing after a more than decade long senseless civil war, Anton "Tony" Hulman George negotiated a new television deal for what was then known as the Indy Racing League.  At the time, ABC/ESPN, who had broadcast the series since 1996 showed little interest in covering much of the schedule outside of the Indianapolis 500. 

George, with few suitors, settled on a deal, in which ABC/ESPN would cover 5 races, Indy included, with Versus covering the balance of the schedule.  Estimates indicated the deal with ABC/ESPN was worth $4-5 million annually, Versus $3-5 million.  A similar version of this deal was essentially agreed upon earlier this summer to continue through 2018.

At the time of the initial deal, reviews were, at best, mixed.  While it was clear Versus did not have the reach or cache of the gargantuan ABC/ESPN empire, rumors of mergers, the promise of extended coverage, the belief that the production of IndyCar broadcasts would improve and the possibility of a growing network tempered some of the concerns.  Lastly, there was at least, the hope that maybe Versus, now NBC Sports Network, and IndyCar would make for a wonderful partnership, collaborating to grow one another other's fledgling brands.

Fast forward to now, and hope might be all IndyCar has.

Yes, after some encouraging improvements to the television ratings in 2011, 2012 saw IndyCar's ratings drop precipitously across the board.  Of course, this very assertion doesn't exactly constitute news, as the series' lousy television deal is an often- discussed topic in the world of IndyCar. 

Two weeks ago, when AutoRacing1.com President Mark Cipolloni suggested I write an article about said  television deal.  Admittedly, I rolled my eyes initially.  To me, an article noting "IndyCar's TV ratings stink," was basically restating the obvious, something I conveyed to my boss in somewhat dismissive terms. 

And Mark did concede his idea wasn't exactly a recent thought since he has been calling it a noose around IndyCar's neck from the day the deal was announced, but likewise made the point that the situation had reached a critical point, a nadir.  Although, not exactly thrilled by the subject, I did begin researching.  Slowly, it became apparent that the situation was not as simplistic as I had originally believed.  I was under the belief the matter was simply one of "the ratings stink, and they need to promote better."  However, the more I studied, the more it became apparent that my initial response to my boss' idea, was wrong. 

Ironically, an idea I initially dismissed, has resulted in this two-part piece, which I believe, is the most important article I have written for AR1.  Sadly, the following will reveal a sobering reality regarding IndyCar's television package.

Now, before moving ahead, I want to make something very clear.  The goal of this article is not to restate the obvious, as indicted earlier, or pile on a great sport that has clearly seen better days.  Nor is this a rambling smear piece devoid of fact, that we sadly see so often nowadays, as in the number of smear pieces from a few months back regarding the status of then-INDYCAR CEO Randy Bernard.

Contrarily, we will take a cold, rational look at the facts available to us.  We will consider where IndyCar has been, where it is going, the evolving television entertainment industry, and the future prospects of the sport we love with regard to its current television situation.  Unfortunately, as someone who proclaims to harbor a deep love for the sport, the data revealed will paint a less than favorable picture.  However, I cannot deny the truth it reveals.

I imagine you will come away from this piece much like I did in my exchanges with Mark.  Sure, you knew the situation was bad.  However, you will ultimately realize, as did I, it is much, much worse than you ever thought. 

See, everyone knows the ratings are lousy.  However, the ratings are merely symptomatic of a much larger issue: a preponderance of evidence suggesting that IndyCar may have yet to find it's potential abyss on NBC Sports. 

Of course, when a situation is so dire, the data available to reveal the problem tends to be voluminous.  Certainly, there will be examples relating to this matter, we will be unable to cover.  However, to begin let us start with a race near and dear to my heart, my home race, Baltimore.

Airing on the same date this past year as it did in 2011, Baltimore's ratings dipped nearly 60%.  While I will welcome evidence to the contrary, I don't recall anyone bragging about the 0.6 rating the 2011 Baltimore race received, yet in 2012 it dropped to 0.2.  The next event, the season finale at Fontana, a fabulously entertaining race by any measure, was watched by an estimated 229,000 viewers, or about 18,000 fewer than watched Baltimore, and 8,000 fewer than watched a bull riding event on NBC Sports that same week.

To be fair, it would be one thing if the Baltimore and Fontana events were blips on the radar, victims of circumstance.  For example, the Fontana race was up against Notre Dame playing Michigan State in football.  We all know football, whether pro, college, or even high school, is king in America, and Notre Dame football is a huge draw, even by football's impressive metrics. 

Still, while Baltimore and Fontana were below average, they weren't below average by much.  In fact, NBC Sports averaged less than 300,000 viewers for their IndyCar broadcasts.  Compare this to 2008, when the series averaged about 800,000 viewers for the races not aired on network television.

For those of you not proficient at math that means that less than half the people who watched IndyCar races in 2008, watched in 2012.  Worse, the minuscule viewership is simply the beginning of IndyCar's television problems.

See, Baltimore and the Sonoma race the week before, which drew 308,000 viewers were the top ranked broadcasts on NBC Sports in their respective weeks.  Yes, you read that correct.  We have a combination of a sport with declining interest on a network with near zero visibility, being shown on a network no one watches.  To illustrate this, let us briefly analyze the performance of another NBC Sports property, Major League Soccer.

NBC Sports showed 40 MLS games in 2012, averaging about 125,000 viewers.  And remember, some of these broadcasts featured international global icon David Beckham, who is no longer with the LA Galaxy.  I wonder if the MLS decision makers sit around and say, "how we can be more like IndyCar?"

All kidding aside, it appears that relative to the capabilities of the network, IndyCar is actually maximizing its potential.  Let me repeat, evidence suggests IndyCar is quite possibly maximizing not it's potential, but it's potential on NBC Sports.  And judging from the performance of other NBCSN properties, it is conceivable IndyCar has not yet found the bottom.

See, of all the "niche," sports currently on the network, IndyCar produces the best ratings.  However, even properties or shows that would be considered "more mainstream," are witnessing incredibly poor viewership.

Bob Costas, for example, undoubtedly a household name, drew 167,000 total viewers for the debut of his "Costas Tonight" show January 2nd, 2012.  Reportedly, the production was good, yet only 108,000 tuned in to watch live.

Concerned yet?  I can go on.  In fact, I will.

Overwhelming evidence suggests that we have reached an era of complete and total ESPN hegemony in the world of sports.  Sure, ABC/ESPN is ostensibly, at least, a "partner," of IndyCar, as the global sports behemoth will broadcast 6 IndyCar races on the network in 2012.  Still, in terms of cable broadcasting, allow me to illuminate ESPN's reach.

Consider the number mentioned earlier, 108,000 viewers, who watched "Costas Tonight," live.  That number equaled the least viewed show on ESPN that month: a repeat of the "World Series of Poker," which aired head-to-head against the Giants-49ers NFC Championship game on Saturday, Jan. 22 (9:30-10 p.m.)

Continuing, this past June, the Women's College World Series drew an average of 1.2 million viewers nationally on ESPN2.  Yes, a record number of viewers, six times the number who witnessed the University of Alabama softball team defeat the University of Oklahoma team in a thrilling 3 game series.

To be clear, my intention is not to disparage softball, nor patronize the Women's College World Series.  I was a collegiate athlete myself once upon a time, and came nowhere close to a national championship, or championship of any kind for that matter.  Simply put, I understand first-hand the sacrifices and talent necessary to be successful at such a level, and have nothing but respect for the accomplished athletes, male or female, who compete.

However, let the record show the collegiate softball championship outdrew the IndyCar Series championship finale by a factor of 6!  Let it be known that the 5 best rated IndyCar broadcasts on NBC Sports combined, about equal the viewership of the softball championship. 

In fairness, this is a testament to the hegemony of ESPN, explained earlier.  Simply put, other than maybe Nike, there is no entity is the world of sports as powerful as ESPN.  While I could probably write a book about the many foibles of ESPN (i.e. their nauseating promotion of the over-hyped NBA, the seemingly endless array of blowhard mouthpieces they call journalists), no one can question the fact these foibles are a byproduct of their enormous success.  In IndyCar, we see this with regard to ABC/ESPN's cursory, unprofessional coverage.  However, the simple reality is, their privileged position within the sporting world, allows them to approach our beloved sport with a blithe indifference.

Ultimately, IndyCar has no one to blame for this, but themselves.  The sport's well-documented self-destruction over the past two decades has diminished its bargaining power, resulting in a sad reality: ABC/ESPN, the most powerful entity in sport, is completely unconcerned with IndyCar.

Of course, this reality leads us back to NBC Sports, who despite it's many foibles does in fact pay IndyCar to cover its events.  As stated earlier, the most worrisome concern is not simply IndyCar's putrid television ratings.  No, television ratings are merely a symptom of a much larger problem: the possibility that IndyCar is maximizing its potential on the fledgling network.  Yes, the evidence suggests there is more room to the downside regarding IndyCar's performance on NBCSN than the upside.  If this is the case, any reasonable person must question the sustainability of IndyCar.

For now, the best IndyCar can do is work within the current parameters.  It's deal with NBC Sports runs through the 2018 season, and last time they negotiated the television deal, IndyCar was not exactly fighting off suitors. 

In Part 2, we will look at the future of IndyCar and the future of NBC Sports Network.  We will analyze what effect, if any, the coming changes to NBC Sports will have for IndyCar, such as the arrival of Formula One, the English Premier League, and possibly NASCAR.  Lastly, we will consider what possibilities, if any, there are for IndyCar to blossom in conjunction with NBC Sports. 

Brian Carroccio is an IndyCar columnist for AutoRacing1.com. He grew up around racing as the son of a longtime SCCA crewman, who regaled him with romantic tales of Jimmy Clark and Dan Gurney.  His first vivid memory of Indy car racing is Danny Sullivan’s 1985 “Spin and Win,” at Indianapolis.

Brian lives in Rockville, MD.  As a lifelong fan of the Washington Redskins his favorite colors are burgundy and gold.  He is also a passionate supporter of Manchester United.

For witty insight on our beloved sport of Indy car racing, and thoughts on other topics of interest to Brian, you can follow him on Twitter @BrianC_AR1.

Feedback can be sent to feedback@autoracing1.com

Go to our forums to discuss this article