for your iPhone
for your iPad
IndyCar

IndyCar Links

2017 Teams

2017 Schedule

2016 IC Rule Book

2015 IC Engine Rules

2015 IC Aero Rules

2014 Indy Lights Rules

2014 Pro Mazda Rules

2014 USF2000 Rules

2014 Drug Policy

2014 Scanner Freq

Race Car Comparison

Lap Time Comparison

History CART/IRL Split


2017 Point Standings
After Gateway
Rank Driver Points

1 Josef Newgarden 547
2 Scott Dixon 516
3 Helio Castroneves 505
4 Simon Pagenaud 504
5 Will Power 464
6 Graham Rahal 436
7 Alexander Rossi 422
8 Takuma Sato 410
9 Tony Kanaan 365
10 James Hinchcliffe 351
11 Ryan Hunter-Reay 337
12 Max Chilton 336
13 Marco Andretti 322
14 Ed Jones 315
15 JR Hildebrand 300
16 Carlos Munoz 278
17 Charlie Kimball 263
18 Conor Daly 245
19 Mikhail Aleshin 237
20 Ed Carpenter 169
21 Spencer Pigot 165
22 Sebastien Bourdais 157
23 Gabby Chaves 98
24 Juan Pablo Montoya 93
25 Esteban Gutierrez 91
26 Sebastian Saavedra 80
27 Oriol Servia 61
28 Fernando Alonso 47
29 Pippa Mann 32
30 Jay Howard 24
31 Sage Karam 23
Zach Veach 23
33 James Davison 21
34 Jack Harvey 17
35 Tristan Vautier 15
36 Buddy Lazier 144

Rookie of Year Standings
1. Ed Jones 315
2. Esteban Gutierrez 91
3. Fernando Alonso 47
4. Zach Veach 23
5. Jack Harvey 17

Manufacturer Standings
1. Chevy 1118
2. Honda 1110

INDYCAR: What's Next?

by Stephen Cox
Monday, December 17, 2012

Advertisement

Justin Wilson at Texas
For weeks I’ve been listening to every media pundit and armchair racer debate what IndyCar should do next. Their TV ratings are in the tank, they just fired a semi-popular CEO without cause, they literally can’t give away tickets to a short oval race and they’re hemorrhaging cash at an appalling rate.

Everyone is offering an idea. The ideas vary, of course, but they all have one thing in common: everybody wants IndyCar to “do” something.

But when things are going haywire, sometimes it’s best to stop, back up, and try to see the big picture.

Instead of perpetually asking what IndyCar should “do” to fix this or that, perhaps we should question the wisdom of the series doing anything at all. Truth be told, every act that American open wheel racing has committed in the last 15 years has only taken us from bad to worse.

Maybe “doing something” isn’t the answer. Perhaps it is the problem. Let's look at a few other recent “do something” moves.

The rule allowing “push to pass” buttons hasn’t really allowed anyone to pass. The rule allowing three engine manufacturers has given us only two engine manufacturers, each selling overpriced V6’s that require a turbocharger to make a puny 600 horsepower and blow up after only 1,800 miles.

The rule forcing everyone to use Firestone “red” tires has had little effect. The series tinkered with the turbo boost rules before and after the Indy 500 trying to artificially manufacture the “right” speeds. They instituted a ridiculous Formula One-like “105% rule” at Indy that essentially gave us a 31-car race instead of 33.

All of this stems from the mistaken belief that the IndyCar series is a master rather than a servant.

Adding more rules clearly isn’t the answer. For crying out loud, the IndyCar rules package feels more like a phone book. If God Almighty could run an entire nation with ten rules, why does IndyCar need 198 pages of them to manage a few dozen cars?

If adding rules were the answer, there would never have been a problem. We’ve already got rules, rules about our rules, rules on how to interpret our rules, and rules on who can make more rules. 

So here’s what I believe IndyCar should do: nothing.

In fact, it’s time to go in reverse.

Cut the rulebook to one page. Cars must be no longer than eighteen feet and no wider than twelve. Tires must be no wider than 10 inches. No more than 300 square inches of wing may be on the car. Any surface on the car that is not parallel with or perpendicular to the ground is a wing regardless of size or location.

There. All done.

Got an old USAC champ car? Sure, bring it out. Never know, you might make the race. An old Infiniti-powered G-Force, or maybe a Rolex prototype? No problem. Take the wings off, mount 10-inch tires and let’s go racing.

At least one hundred car and driver combinations would show up to make qualifying attempts for the 2013 Indianapolis 500. Guaranteed. I would be one of them. The garage area would be overflowing with Indy 500 hopefuls. You know… like it used to be... when an IndyCar was a car that raced at Indy, not a series.

IndyCar should simply stop telling people what to do. Adding more rules isn’t the answer. It’s the problem. Forcing people to buy engines, tubs and tires from a single source hasn’t controlled costs, it hasn’t expanded the field and it hasn’t produced a new golden age for open wheel racing. On the contrary, IndyCar can barely muster 33 cars for its own 500.

Glorified spec racing has had a decade to do something other than fail. It’s time to relegate it to the dustbin of racing history and liberate the most over-regulated sport on the planet.

What should IndyCar do? Nothing. Just tear up the rulebook and get out of the way.

Stephen Cox

Feedback can be sent to feedback@autoracing1.com

Go to our forums to discuss this article